![]() Build the Base - Don't Abandon It Some in the Democratic Party (and a few "helpful Republicans") demand we abandon our core beliefs and our base in order to appeal to "the mainstream." They claim we "lose" because we're too strong on personal freedom and equality - especially protecting people from government interference in their choice to become parents or not, and protecting minorities from various threats and oppression public and private. They don't understand that we are the mainstream. Most of the polls show most Americans agree with us on most of the issues. But more than that. Betrayal of people who depend upon us - and the principles upon which we depend - would be immoral, unthinking and political suicide. This is not "New Age" or even new. Harry S. Truman and FDR staked out this territory for us decades ago. Let's reclaim our birthright as Democrats and build our base - not betray it. We should never back off from our base or sacrifice our principles. Here's the sad calculus of capitulation: For every vote we'd gain trying to mollify right-of-center voters, we'd lose three or more. We will never "out right wing" the right wing. It makes no sense to even try. As Harry Truman said, "Given the choice between a Republican and someone who acts like a Republican, people will vote for the real Republican all the time." More on President Truman later, but put plainly America doesn't need two Republican Parties. According to opinion polls, many Americans don't think we even need one GOP! We do need a different kind of conversation. Not an acrimonious shouting match. A discussion of shared ideals and principles and ways to work together - traditional and progressive - in the public interest. Democrats do well because most of the electorate supports our positions on almost all the issues - even the most controversial ones. Most voters favor choice and equality for gays, women, and racial and religious minorities. The only issues on which we fall short concern misunderstandings based on the carefully crafted Republican disinformation about our stands and capabilities. Republicans cast us as weak on national security, crime and other "get tough" priorities. Betraying our base would only play into the stereotype of Democratic "weakness" upon which Republicans rely. Why make it easier for them to pin the "wimp" tail on the donkey? The mushy middle voters we seek to win would see our fecklessness for what it is, as many in our base expressed disgust and turned to third parties or refused to vote at all. We'd lose support at both ends! No matter how we try, we will never win over the fraction of the electorate stuck in a time-warp of bigotry and government intrusion into the most private and personal decisions by feeding into their antisocial impulses. We can strive to educate and inform them, to help them progress out of their prejudice, but it makes no sense to reinforce their regressive attitudes. We should offer wise, good and strong leadership and hope all follow, but there are those we cannot reach without sacrificing too much of what we are. So be it. Franklin Roosevelt laughed at his enemies, "I welcome their hatred," and so we should not fear nor should we appease those who remain hostile to our fundamental values. Our values are popular. We should never work to become less popular! Democrats prevail even on the so-called "moral" issues. On economic issues - fair vs. "free" trade, the living wage, health care for all, protecting not privatizing Social Security, promoting good jobs at home rather than subsidizing out sourcing, and many more - we enjoy enormous advantages. All of these are "moral" issues. All of these have been Democratic issues for decades. We should embrace our identity and build on our strong pillars, rather than engage in cosmetic surgery trying to appear as something we're not and don't want to become. As FDR explained, "No business which depends for its existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country." He also provided us with a yardstick to measure our national success: "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little" and he explained, "Whoever seeks to set one race against another seeks to enslave all races." These quotes indict much of the right wing program and politics. On all of these critical concerns, most voters trust and support us - not the Republicans. Why should we reject Roosevelt to stand with Rove? What Republicans call "moral issues" are really divisive "wedge" issues designed in think tanks and tested in focus groups to divide Americans. Right wing pols and consultants know they cannot win on any of them, but they press "hot buttons" and denounce Democrats as soft - on terrorism, on crime - to keep elections close enough to steal. This - not any embrace of justice and equality for all - cost us the White House in 2000 and 2004. Lack of a clear, differentiated message cost us in Congressional races as well, but let's not overstate these problems. Let's focus on the future and make progress from today forward. How can we overcome apathetic if not pathetic mass media, and Republican message machine which dominates and misleads public discourse and the other problems we face? We can surrender unilaterally by squandering valued members of our base trying to be Republican-lite. We can squabble with Republicans over each issue until too many voters cry a pox on both your parties. Or we can rise above food-fight partisanship, appeal to the best in Americans, and win landslides by speaking to people about them and their needs directly, honestly, and effectively. We must accept that few who refuse to support us because of their opposition to reproductive choice or gay rights would switch because we fudged on these issues. We should also recognize the need to reach out to "swing voters" while not retreating from hard-won progress. Therefore, we need to move ahead without betraying our base, presenting as weak, or taking one step forward and three steps back. Since the Republican strategy relies on exploiting national pain and exacerbating division with appeals to low instincts and fears, we can use markedly different and better ways to reach people. We can work to calm, heal, empower and unite people to move the United States ahead together. Much of the emotional fuel driving the right wing political engine arises from a sense of powerlessness against massive forces of rapid change. Fear of terror attack feeds into this exaggerated sense of victimization. This is the aim of terrorism, and the right wing unwittingly collaborates by heightening fear for partisan purpose. They also scapegoat "elites" in Hollywood, in the media and academia, and the Democratic Party as demons bent on assaulting "traditional values" - family, marriage, faith. Meanwhile Republicans also paint us as capitulators too weak or indecisive to protect Americans from harm. In a Post-911 climate - with many still suffering a post traumatic stress reaction - Democrats lose support from swing voters. Fear is a powerful tool or weapon, and the Republicans use it well. Although these accusations lack rational merit - in fact they contradict each other: how can we be so powerful and so weak at the same time? - They've demonized us. We haven't provided an adequate response to these attacks because we cannot refute demonization by acting angry or show strength by acting weak. When we do either, the Republicans and their friends in the media "tut tut" about how we're confirming one negative impression or the other. For example, John Kerry is too weak because he changed his mind. Howard Dean is too mean because he spoke his mind clearly. Clearly this is a game we cannot win, so I suggest we stop playing and try different ways. Republican policies fail to serve the national interest because they're based on wrong assumptions, serve tiny special interests, and generally put short-term gain for the few over the well-being of the majority. Therefore, when people vote their conscious interests, we will win. That provides us with a tremendous opportunity. The outrages go on and on, and we've been speaking out on them forever. What's different is the approach. I suggest we consciously and openly reject the right wing ethos in all its forms, but do so in a way that brings together as many people as possible. We should avoid overt conflict and debate, providing viable alternatives rather than just criticize the right wing's wrong approaches. When not labeled as "liberal" or "Democratic" or tied to any specific candidate, we win on all the issues. Therefore, we can and should win any contest on any issue when voters understand and can express self-support for their position. Therefore, our job isn't to change ourselves or our appearance. Rather we must better educate, inform, and empower the people to act in their interests. We also have to help people heal the wounds of 911 as much as possible to free them from color-coded terror alert manipulations. Good counselors know they cannot solve problems by telling people what to do. They foster conscious decision-making as opposed to action or reaction to unconscious and unexamined stimuli. This empowers individuals to take control of their own life and rests responsibility for actions with them. If they do something stupid, then they must accept blame for that, but they can also change their attitude and plan to act better in the future. The control is theirs. Republicans try to tell people one way - the right wing way - is best. We will defend and promote basic American grass-roots individualism and respect for freedom of speech, religion, and thought. As they attack the New Deal and traditions like public schools and Senate rules, we will oppose their radicalism and "ends justify the means" expediency with calls for respect for progress founded on Constitutional principles. As they scare voters with predictions of terrorist attacks, we will present sound policies to make people more secure with rational responses to terrorism as well against the wide range of threats more likely to harm them - from "loose nukes" and lack of international cooperation to global warming and environmental degradation. We will prove that Republicans' obsession with Saddam and Iraq prevents Americans from protecting themselves against serious threats. Republican polices let corporations spew poisons into our air and water and lace our foods with hormones and pesticides - domestic WMDs. This harms and kills people every day. I began talking about using a healing / counseling approach at the Take Back America Conference last week, and got a good response from several people. It's very different from the partisan / political conflict which is turning off rather than reaching many mainstream Americans who support us on the issues. I propose fleshing out and testing this approach to reach and teach the majority of Americans who generally oppose right wing policies. I think we can get through to people who aren't paying attention if we avoid asking them to vote for any specific party or candidate yet, just get them to think and feel - to heal and deal with the 9/11 trauma, Iraq War, stolen elections and aftermath - in a non-confrontational way. We reach out to people and find them "where they are" rather than trying to draw them to us. We offer to help solve problems instead of asking people to help us elect specific candidates - at least for now. We talk and listen aiming to make our fellow Americans more secure - from terror, but also from other threats. We work to provide high quality health care to all and fully fund scientific and medical research including stem cells, HIV/AIDS, cancer, heart disease, addiction and other killers far more statistically threatening than terrorism but often casualties of short-sighted budgetary policies, misplaced priorities, and religious extremism. To recap: We can't beat Republicans by becoming Republican Lite. We cannot grow our support by shrinking our base. Republican failure, arrogance and radicalism hands us incredible opportunity. We still hold the high ground on all our traditional issues and now can claim many of "their" traditional issues as well - from effective national security to respect for individuals vs. intolerable interference and expense of "big government." We attract swing voters by presenting calm strength and respect for their beliefs and needs by engaging them with language of healing rather than engaging the right wing in demeaning conflict with rules stacked against us and bought-off referees. This is nothing "new age" or even new, President Harry S. Truman gave a speech in Charleston, West Virginia on October 1, 1948 which - with few changes - any Progressive Democrat could deliver today. He said the following:
See: democraticunderground.com/index.php/Harry_S._Truman © Copyright 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 by MikeHersh.com and identified authors. MikeHersh.com invites you to broadcast any material at this site, provided you identify the source as MikeHersh.com. All print, Internet, email and other summaries, excerpts or other written reproductions must include this blurb and a link to http://www.MikeHersh.com. |