As the 9/11 Commission winds down into the final phases of an apparent cover-up,
lingering questions remain unanswered - even unasked. Aside from several
oddities and unanswered questions - conflicts between the official "coincidence
theory" and inexplicable facts including:
1. Absence of fighter jets which should have scrambled to interdict the
hijacked airliners,
2. Incongruities between photographic evidence of damage to the Pentagon
grounds building and an airliner impact,
3. The sequence of events at the World Trade Center which defy physics.
The 9/11 Commission should have investigated the possibility that some
elements in the US military and / or intelligence services may have condoned if
not orchestrated the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Inconceivable?
Hysterical conspiracy theory? Unfortunately not.
November 7, 2001 ABC News reported that during the early 1960s, the US Joint
Chiefs of Staff - the interface between the military and civilian leadership -
entertained a strategy to manipulate the nation into war against Cuba. David
Ruppe's story, Headlined "Friendly Fire" and sub-headed "Book: U.S. Military
Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba" detailed:
"Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible
assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high
seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent
terrorism in U.S. cities."
These US Government plans included "hijacking planes" and "orchestrating
terrorism in U.S. cities." The motivation, confirmed by ABC, was "to trick the
American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust
Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro." ABC based its report on a book
called "Body of Secrets," by reporter James Bamford.
ABC News explained, "America's top military brass even contemplated causing
U.S. military casualties, writing: 'We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo
Bay and blame Cuba,' and, 'casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a
helpful wave of national indignation.'"
We have conclusive evidence highly placed officials formulated plans to
"Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War." This is according to ABC News, not some
internet conspiracy theory. The concept of killing innocent Americans with the
avowed intention of driving us into war against a despot targeted as a threat to
national security dates back to the John F. Kennedy years. In 1962, government
officials targeted Fidel Castro's Cuba. Was it Saddam Hussein's Iraq in 2001?
So we know government officials not only foresaw, but considered using
terrorism as a tool to trick the public into supporting war in 1962, but is
there any proof current administration officials would consider this? Yes.
PNAC - the Project for the New American Century - published a blueprint for
remaking US Defense and Middle East polices. They advocated invasion of Iraq to
establish a beacon of Democracy. In their January 26, 1998 letter to
then-President Clinton, PNAC advocated "military action as diplomacy is clearly
failing" and "removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power."
Among the signatories were Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as well as other
high-ranking Bush Administration officials Elliott Abrams, Richard L. Armitage,
and Paul Wolfowitz. See: http://www.newamericancentury.org/
PNAC called for an aggressive military-based approach to American foreign
policy in their document entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses, Strategy,
Forces and Resources For a New Century A Report of The Project for the New
American Century dated September 2000. Presaging Bush "Axis of Evil" rhetoric
and policy.
PNAC claimed "adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to
develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons." They considered Iraq an
attractive pretext to establish US military control of the oil-rich Persian Gulf
region: "Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more
permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with
Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American
force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam
Hussein."
These statements and others calling for an "increase in strength, more
permanent basing arrangements" in the Gulf place the Bush Administration rush to
war in Iraq in clearer context. According to these documents, top-level Bush
policy-makers hoped to establish a large permanent military presence in the
region, and they considered Iraq the ideal location.
Lamenting restraints "Domestic politics and industrial policy" placed on
their ambitions, the PNAC members observed, "the process of transformation, even
if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." See: Rebuilding
America's Defenses, pp.16, 26, 29, 51, http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
How much different is Northwoods from PNAC and 9/11? Flash forward forty
years. Taken together with the obstruction, secrecy and bald-faced lies from
Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell and others, reports about plans to engineer
support for war through a "new Pearl Harbor" (PNAC) or "hijacking planes" and
"orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities" (Northwoods).
ABC reports, according to evidence Bamford uncovered, "The plans had the
written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to
President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they
apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed
for nearly 40 years."
We don't have to wait four decades. We have the PNAC plans dating back to
early 1998, as well as evidence the Bush/Cheney administration planned to carry
out the PNAC plans within days after assuming power, several months before
9/11/01. This as revealed by former Bush Administration officials Richard Clarke
and Paul O'Neill.
We have conclusive evidence highly placed officials formulated plans to
"Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War." This is according to ABC News, not some
internet conspiracy theory. The concept of killing innocent Americans with the
avowed intention of driving us into war against a despot targeted as a threat to
national security dates back to the John F. Kennedy years. In 1962, government
officials targeted Fidel Castro's Cuba. Was it Saddam Hussein's Iraq in 2001?
These and other lingering questions remain unanswered - even unasked - in the
carefully orchestrated, constrained and obstructed investigation into the most
deadly attack on US soil in US history. In the wake of the Team Bush's
catastrophic failure to keep us safe, we may not be able to force the
Bush/Cheney PNAC Administration to come clean, but we can - and must - force
them out of office.
© Copyright 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 by MikeHersh.com
and identified authors. MikeHersh.com invites you to broadcast
any material at this site, provided you identify the source as
MikeHersh.com. All print, Internet, email and other summaries, excerpts
or other written reproductions must
include this blurb and a link to http://www.MikeHersh.com.